On August 1, 2025, President Donald Trump announced he had ordered two U.S. nuclear submarines to be deployed to “appropriate regions” in response to provocative remarks by former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev. Medvedev had warned Trump to “remember” Russia’s Soviet-era nuclear capabilities after Trump issued a 10-day ultimatum for a ceasefire in Ukraine or face tariffs. Trump described the move as precautionary, warning that “words can lead to unintended consequences.”
While analysts generally view the submarine deployment as symbolic rather than a direct step toward nuclear confrontation, it is unclear how Russian President Vladimir Putin will interpret the gesture. In light of these developments, comparing the nuclear postures of the United States and Russia is essential to understanding the current strategic balance and its potential implications.
Russia possesses the world’s largest nuclear arsenal, with an estimated 5,580 total warheads. Of these, 1,710 are deployed, 2,670 are in storage, and around 1,200 are retired, giving Russia approximately 4,380 warheads available for operational use. In comparison, the United States maintains about 5,044 nuclear weapons. According to the most recent New START declaration, 1,419 strategic nuclear warheads are deployed on 662 strategic delivery systems. Relevant to a potential conflict with Russia, the United States maintains approximately 150 theater nuclear weapons stationed in Europe.
Together, the United States and Russia control roughly 90 percent of the world’s nuclear weapons, but their doctrines reflect vastly different thresholds for use. The 2022 U.S. Nuclear Posture Review (NPR) reaffirms that the fundamental role of U.S. nuclear weapons is to deter nuclear attacks against the United States, its allies, and partners.
Despite campaign promises to adopt a “sole purpose” policy, that nuclear weapons would only be used to deter nuclear attacks, the Biden administration ultimately rejected both “No First Use” and “Sole Purpose” doctrines. After a comprehensive review, the NPR concluded that such commitments would impose an “unacceptable level of risk,” given the potential for non-nuclear threats to cause strategic-level damage.
Instead, the United States maintains a policy of calculated strategic ambiguity. It reserves the right to employ nuclear weapons under “extreme circumstances” when the vital interests of the U.S. or its allies and partners are at stake. These circumstances could include not only nuclear attacks but also significant non-nuclear strategic attacks, such as those on civilian populations, infrastructure, or U.S. command and control systems. The posture is designed to complicate an adversary’s decision-making by creating uncertainty over how the U.S. might respond to various forms of aggression.
This doctrine explicitly extends to U.S. allies, reinforcing the nuclear umbrella that deters attacks on NATO members and other strategic partners.
Russia’s November 2024 nuclear doctrine significantly lowers the threshold for nuclear weapons use compared to the 2020 policy. The previous doctrine allowed nuclear retaliation only if Russia faced a threat to “the very existence of the state.”
The updated policy now permits nuclear use in response to conventional aggression that poses a “critical threat” to the sovereignty or territorial integrity of Russia or Belarus. It also specifies additional scenarios, including a ballistic missile launch against Russia or its allies, and the “massive launch” of aerospace attack systems, such as cruise missiles, hypersonic weapons, or drones, crossing into Russian airspace.
Notably, aggression by a non-nuclear state is considered a joint nuclear threat if it occurs “with the participation or support” of a nuclear-armed power, a clause aimed squarely at NATO’s military support for Ukraine.
The 2022 U.S. Nuclear Posture Review acknowledges a new strategic era in which the United States must contend with two major nuclear-armed competitors: Russia and China. In response, the U.S. maintains a high threshold for nuclear use, grounded in deterrence, while Russia’s evolving doctrine increasingly treats nuclear weapons as instruments of coercion and warfighting.
Russia will likely interpret the deployment of two U.S. nuclear submarines as a serious escalation in nuclear signaling. Under its revised 2024 doctrine, which lowered the threshold for nuclear use, Moscow may view such actions as crossing red lines tied to its territorial sovereignty. The release of the updated doctrine appears to be part of a coordinated effort to deter attacks on Russian territory, particularly those carried out with weapons supplied to Ukraine by the United States and other NATO countries.
The US president says he was forced to deploy two subs in response to an inappropriate online “threat” by former leader Medvedev.
US President Donald Trump has said he cannot treat any talk of nuclear weapons lightly and that the US must always be ”totally prepared” for any potential confrontation, responding to what he described as an inappropriate ”threat” issued by former Russian head of state Dmitry Medvedev.
At a White House press conference, Trump explained his order to deploy two nuclear submarines earlier on Friday. He had vowed to send them to what he called ”the appropriate regions” in a post on Truth Social in reaction to remarks made by Medvedev on social media.
“Well, we had to do that. We just have to be careful. A threat was made, and we didn’t think it was appropriate,” Trump said. ”So I do that on the basis of safety for our people. A threat was made by a former president of Russia, and we’re going to protect our people.”
Well, you just have to read what he said. He was talking about nuclear. When you talk about nuclear, we have to be prepared. And we’re totally prepared
Earlier in the week, Medvedev had reacted to Trump’s dismissal of New Delhi’s commitment to relying on Russian energy. “About India’s and Russia’s ‘dead economies’ and ‘entering very dangerous territory’ – well, let him remember his favorite movies about ‘the walking dead,’ as well as how dangerous the fabled ‘Dead Hand’ can be,” Medvedev wrote.
The dispute escalated after Trump referred to Medvedev as a ”failed” leader
The dispute escalated after Trump referred to Medvedev as a ”failed” leader and warned him to ”watch his words.” Medvedev, who currently serves as deputy chairman of Russia’s Security Council, responded with a scathing message warning against provoking Moscow too far, referencing the legendary ‘Perimetr’ automatic nuclear retaliation system, which dates back to the Soviet era and is presumed to still exist in Russia.
Though Russia has never officially confirmed the existence of the system, it is widely believed by Western analysts to serve as a last-resort deterrent in the event of a decapitating strike on the Russian leadership.
Trump condemned the former Russian leader’s rhetoric as ”foolish and inflammatory,” warning that ”words are very important, and can often lead to unintended consequences.”
The White House and the Pentagon have not provided any further comments, and Trump’s claim about the submarine redeployment remains impossible to verify, since the exact locations and patrol areas of US nuclear submarines are among the military’s most closely guarded secrets.
Featured today ENIGMA All Roads Lead to Obama. We are shown 'through the looking glass" a new version of ENIGMA. OLD SCHOOL FILMS takes us on a Journey that with Song and fanfare we are guided through the mind of President Trump that for 9 long years has known these FACTS. That this day would come.
Obama was a fake man created by the CIA. John Brennan wrote his book, photo-shopped the pictures, created the fake birth certificate and fabricated his time in College and a relationship with a Transexual. With purchased kids and a family tree. We have endured a time like the Beatles "Yellow Submarine" where nothing is real and nothing to get hung about... and the next period of time where all is revealed. Buckle up Buttercups.. it's going to be a bumpy ride.
Juan O Savin joins the corner with a crucial and urgent message.. Trump has now sent nuclear subs to the coast of Russia as the Trump deadline approaches. Juan has been stating a Cuban Missile Crisis with Russia would transpire for years.. Is it finally here? You decide! This podcast will be continued in detail on Ninoscorner.tv
Glenn Beck speaks with Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard to get some exclusive insight on the ‘burn bags’ found by FBI Director Kash Patel, the Russiagate conspiracy, and the rot that still exists in the agency. Will we actually see justice come to those who pushed this hoax through? Gabbard emphasized the importance of declassifying everything to bring accountability.
