Link to my cover video:
Jack Posobiec Issues Emergency Warning: Neocon/Harris Axis Threatening WWIII To Save Regime
The Alex Jones Show Sep 13, 2024
Make no mistake about it the Deep State Neocons in Washington have lost their minds, they have gone completely insane. They are so desperate to keep President Trump out of the White House that they are willing to start World War III/IV.
Mel K & Matt Ehret | Future Proves Past: World War One Revisited | 9-8-24
The Mel K Show September 8, 2024
Major Escalation Towards WWIII
Greg Reese Sep 13, 2024
NATO forces starting war with Russia
In February of 2022, Biden threatened the Nord Stream Pipeline.
“If Russia invades. That means tanks or troops crossing the, the border of Ukraine. Again, then there will be, there will be no longer, Nord Stream two. We, we will bring an end to it.” ~ Joe Biden “What, what, how will you, how will you do that exactly? Since the project and control of the project is within Germany's control? ~ reporter “We will, I promise you, we'll be able to do it. ~ Joe BidenOne month later, he was a harbinger for World War Three.
“We are showing a strength and we will never falter. But look, the idea, the idea that we're going to send in offensive equipment and have planes and tanks and trains going in with American pilots and American crews. Just understand, and don't kid yourself, no matter what you all say, that's called world War three. Okay, let's get it straight here, guys.” ~ Joe BidenSix months later, the Nord Stream Pipeline was destroyed by NATO forces. NATO forces who overthrew the Ukraine government ten years ago. NATO forces who have been building bio-weapons labs and missile systems along the Russian border for decades.
And now NATO forces are discussing plans to deploy advanced long-range weapons to target deep into Russia. Which would most definitely trigger a full scale war with Russia.
Vladimir Putin responded yesterday to this major escalation. He said that,
“This is an attempt at manipulation. Because it is not about allowing or forbidding the Kiev regime from striking inside Russia. They are already doing that with drones, flying devices and other means. But when it comes to using A.I. precision weapons, long range Western made ones, that's a completely different story. The point is, and I've already mentioned this, any experts could confirm this, both ours and Western ones, that the Ukrainian army is not capable of launching strikes with modern, high precision, long range, Western made systems. This is only possible with the use of a proprietary system. Which Ukraine does not have. This information comes only from European Union or United States satellites. Essentially NATO satellites. That is the first thing. And very importantly, maybe the key thing, is that flight missions on these rocket systems can basically only be programmed by military personnel from NATO countries. Ukrainian servicemen are not able to do this. That's why it's not about allowing the Ukrainian regime to strike Russia with these weapons or not allowing it. It's about deciding whether NATO countries directly participate in the military conflict or not. If this decision is made, it will mean nothing less than the direct involvement of NATO countries. The United States and European countries in the war in Ukraine. This is their direct involvement. And it significantly changes the nature of the conflict. It would mean that NATO countries, the USA and European countries are at war with Russia, and if so, given the change in the nature of the conflict, we will make the corresponding decisions based on the threats posed to us.” ~ Vladimir Putin
WW3 WATCH: Putin Warns Authorization to Fire Long-Range Missiles Deep Inside Russia Will Mean NATO Is at War With Russia
by Paul Serran Sep. 13, 2024 9:00 am
In these two and a half years of war in Ukraine, we see how US and NATO support for Kiev has breached one by one all the Russian so-called ‘red lines’, up until we come to the frightening position that the West is about to greenlight attacks with its long-range missiles deep inside Russian territory, a move that can unleash unimaginable consequences.
That has led Russian President Vladimir Putin to once again warn that the U.S. and NATO would be ‘at war’ with Russia if the West allows Ukraine use long-range missiles – and, in fact, as we will see – be the ones to fire them.
This comes after US State Secretary Anthony Blinken and UK’s Foreign Secretary David Lammy met with President Volodymyr Zelensky in Kiev on Wednesday (11) to discuss exactly that.
Daily Mail reported:
“Putin said the move from the West would ‘change the very nature of the conflict’, and issued a severe threat against giving Zelensky more firepower.
‘It would mean that NATO countries, the US, European countries, are at war with Russia,’ he told a state TV reporter on Thursday. ‘If that’s the case, then taking into account the change of nature of the conflict, we will take the appropriate decisions based on the threats that we will face.’
He added that clearing the way for Ukraine to use missiles that can hit Russian targets ‘is a decision on whether NATO countries are directly involved in the conflict or not’.”Putin’s warning comes less than 24 hours before President Joe Biden today’s meeting with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer at the White House.
Zelensky is pressuring the West to give him more firepower and air defenses after a series of deadly Russian rocket attacks.
“The Institute for the Study of War, a US think-tank, last month established a list of nearly 250 high value military and paramilitary targets within range of the weapons that could be demolished by Ukraine. Among the main targets laid out by the ISW include as many as 16 Russian air bases, a slew of brigade and division headquarters, artillery and missile units central to Russia’s air defence capabilities, and a variety of logistics hubs supplying Vladimir Putin’s units on the frontlines.
[…] The Kursk nuclear power station and several nuclear weapons stockpiles also pose theoretical targets.”The Daily Mail report is disingenuous in the sense that it says that ‘Kiev’s soldiers will soon be able to strike Russian military assets as deep as 300km (190 miles) inside Russia’ when in fact, the target selection and the firing would have to be done by NATO troops, as Putin makes it very clear in his warning:
PUTIN: “When it comes to using high–precision long-range Western-made weapons, it’s a completely different story. The fact is that, as I have already said, and any experts will confirm this (both here and in the West), the Ukrainian army is not able to strike with modern high-precision long-range systems of Western production.
It can’t do that. This is possible only with the use of satellite data, which Ukraine does not have — this is data only from satellites of either the European Union or the United States, in general, from NATO satellites. This is the first one.
The second, and very important, perhaps key, is that flight missions to these missile systems can, in fact, only be carried out by military personnel of NATO countries. Ukrainian servicemen cannot do this. And therefore, it is not a question of allowing the Ukrainian regime to strike Russia with these weapons or not to allow it. It’s about deciding whether NATO countries are directly involved in a military conflict or not. If this decision is made, it will mean nothing more than the direct participation of NATO countries, the United States, and European countries in the war in Ukraine.”To give a more detailed explanation of this difference, read Simplicius on Substack:
“When Ukraine sends its cardboard drones to Moscow, it can get the coordinates on Google maps or whatever other open source database, and does not really need Western involvement.
But advanced missiles and weapons systems are often run by proprietary software that requires special keys, programs, equipment, etc., to input the coordinates into them which cannot be done by the Ukrainians themselves, because giving them such digital ‘keys’ could compromise the entire system even in the home NATO countries in case of future conflict.
Thus, Putin is saying that for these systems to strike deep into Russia would necessarily mean NATO would be directly involved as a combatant in striking Russian territory in a more express way than ever before.”Thus, Putin is saying that for these systems to strike deep into Russia would necessarily mean NATO would be directly involved as a combatant in striking Russian territory in a more express way than ever before.”
Share this post